Manchester United's exit from the Carabao Cup in the second round at Grimsby Town last season remains a vivid memory for many supporters. That defeat has become almost emblematic of the era under former head coach Rúben Amorim, marking a low point that still lingers in the collective consciousness of the fan base.

While the recent loss at Old Trafford to Brighton may not carry the same historic weight, it shares unsettling parallels for Michael Carrick, the manager who succeeded Amorim. Youri Tielemans, United's captain on the day of the Brighton defeat, was candid in the post‑match interview. He admitted that once the team fell behind by two goals, the players seemed to lose their drive and simply stopped competing with the same intensity, a sentiment that was plainly visible on the pitch. From roughly the 20‑minute mark onward, Brighton began to dominate, dictating the tempo and creating chances at will.

Despite United's attempts to turn the tide by introducing Bruno Fernandes, Kobbie Mainoo, Bryan Mbeumo and Matheus Cunha, the visitors failed to make any meaningful impact, and the match slipped further away. For Carrick, this lack of response is deeply concerning. In the handful of defeats he has endured since taking over in January, he has typically found a silver lining, highlighting individual performances or positive tactical adjustments. The Brighton game, however, offered no such redemption.

The team looked disjointed, the midfield appeared bereft of creativity, and the defence was riddled with lapses. When Carrick and his backroom staff first arrived, the early signs were promising. Defensive organization improved dramatically, leading to impressive victories over rivals Manchester City and Arsenal.

The arrivals of Steve Holland, Jonathan Woodgate and Jonny Evans injected fresh ideas and solidity into the back line, and the side appeared tighter and more compact than in previous seasons. Nevertheless, the current campaign has exposed fresh vulnerabilities. United have now conceded two goals in three of their four Premier League fixtures, a statistic that points to underlying defensive frailties. The Brighton loss highlighted these issues starkly.

One of the goals resulted from a clear error by goalkeeper Karl Darlow, but beyond that, the back four displayed a bewildering lack of cohesion and positional awareness. Their shape collapsed at critical moments, leaving spaces for opponents to exploit. Left‑back remains a particularly thorny problem for Carrick. Although he has not publicly labelled it a weakness, the position has been a source of anxiety since the summer transfer window.

Luke Shaw, the only senior left‑back on United's books, has missed the last three games due to a minor injury. Given his age and history of recurring muscle problems—despite an impressive run of availability last season—it was arguably shortsighted not to secure a reliable alternative during the transfer period. Carrick has experimented with Noussair Mazraoui in that role, but the Moroccan international appears to have slipped down the pecking order, with the less experienced Patrick Dorgu preferred for the Manchester derby that also ended in defeat. Meanwhile, young prospect Harry Amass does not seem to be in the long‑term plans for the left side of defence.

The pressing question, therefore, is how United will address this deficiency for the remainder of the season, especially as the fixture list becomes increasingly demanding. It may seem premature to question Carrick's job security after just a few weeks of the new campaign, especially when the team still holds the highest points total accumulated since his return in January.

Yet, as Carrick himself has acknowledged, pivotal moments—such as Ainsley Maitland‑Niles' equaliser for Everton, a contentious VAR decision against Manchester City, and now the disheartening collapse versus Brighton—have altered the narrative surrounding his tenure. A forthcoming league match against Fulham, broadcast live on Sky Sports, could become a litmus test. Should United drop points, the conversation about Carrick's ability to navigate the club out of its current storm will inevitably intensify.

While it may be too early for definitive judgments, the manager deserves some empathy given the constraints he faces. The summer transfer window saw limited outgoing activity, which hampered United's capacity to reinforce the squad adequately. This shortfall does not absolve the club of responsibility for neglecting key areas, particularly left‑back.

Moreover, with striker Benjamin Šeško nursing a shin injury throughout the summer, United might have benefited from securing a temporary No.9 to share the burden rather than deploying Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo out of position. Both forwards have struggled to recapture the form they displayed under Carrick's guidance last season. Until United can execute a comprehensive overhaul in a single window, they will likely remain trapped in a cycle of piecemeal signings, relying heavily on players inherited from previous regimes. This reality may explain the boos that echoed around Old Trafford after the Brighton defeat—an expression not only of frustration with the performance but also of a deeper, familiar sense of déjà vu, as if history is repeating itself with another false dawn following an initially hopeful start under a new manager.

It is still early days, and Carrick deserves patience after the achievements of the prior season. Nevertheless, he must now steer his ship through increasingly choppy waters, and his ultimate verdict will be decided by results. If he can halt the downward spiral—perhaps even without a win against Fulham but by delivering a convincing performance—there may still be time for him to redirect Manchester United back onto a steadier course.