The West Ham United Fan Advisory Board (FAB) has publicly asked former chairman David Sullivan to refrain from attending any of the club's fixtures at the London Stadium, warning that his presence could prove to be a disruptive element and raise security concerns. In a formal statement, the FAB expressed ongoing anxiety that Sullivan’s attendance at home matches might cause offence and upset among certain sections of the fan base, potentially sparking negative reactions that could detract from the matchday atmosphere. Sullivan stepped down from his role as a director and joint chairman of West Ham in June, shortly before The Times and BBC Panorama released an investigative report into allegations of sexual misconduct. He has consistently denied any wrongdoing and maintains that the accusations are unfounded.
Despite his resignation from the board, he remains a major shareholder in the club, a fact that the supporters’ body highlighted when explaining why his attendance could be particularly contentious. The FAB explained that many supporters have already voiced discomfort at the idea of seeing Sullivan in the stands, suggesting that his presence might necessitate heightened security measures at a time when both the club and the stadium are under significant financial strain.
The statement referenced reports indicating that the operators of the London Stadium have already advised the club that Sullivan should not be present at games, citing the potential for fan unrest and the need for additional safety protocols. According to the club’s ground regulations, entry can be denied to any individual whose presence could constitute a danger, nuisance, or annoyance to others. The FAB argued that Sullivan’s attendance could fall squarely within that definition, given the heightened emotions surrounding the recent allegations and his former leadership role.
The supporters’ group expressed disappointment that the club has not taken more decisive action to bar him from the stadium, especially when the risk of reigniting old tensions appears high. The statement also criticised what the FAB described as Sullivan placing his personal interests ahead of the club’s collective good. It pointed out that senior advisors had reportedly urged him not to attend matches, yet he has not publicly indicated any intention to comply. This perceived disregard for the advice of the club’s leadership and the concerns of the fan base was framed as a further point of contention.
Despite these grievances, the FAB made clear that it continues to support the current West Ham executive team. It praised the recent improvements in dialogue between the club’s management and its supporters, noting that the new leadership appears to be steering the organization in a positive direction. The group encouraged fans to focus on backing the team and fostering a constructive atmosphere at the London Stadium, rather than allowing the issue of Sullivan’s attendance to dominate conversations.
West Ham’s upcoming home campaign begins with an EFL Cup tie against Portsmouth on Saturday. The FAB called on supporters to channel their energy into cheering on the team and creating a welcoming environment for players and families alike. It emphasized that a positive matchday experience benefits everyone and that the club’s on‑field performance should remain the primary focus.
Sky Sports News has reached out to West Ham United for comment, but the club has not responded at the time of writing. Earlier in the week, it was reported that the London Stadium’s operators had formally recommended that Sullivan refrain from attending games due to the potential for fan unrest.
The stadium management requested advance notice of any planned visits by Sullivan so that they could put in place appropriate safety and operational measures. A spokesperson for the London Stadium said: "Following media reports at the end of the season regarding a safeguarding matter being managed by the club, London Stadium sought further information to ensure it could fulfil its own safeguarding responsibilities.
Based on the information provided by the club, we understand the matter was investigated and that the club does not consider there to be an ongoing safeguarding risk associated with Mr Sullivan attending the stadium. However, given the potential for demonstrations and anti‑social behaviour by some spectators, we have recommended to the club that he does not attend. We have also requested advance notice of any planned attendance so that appropriate safety and operational measures can be put in place.
For operational reasons we will not comment on if we have had notice that he will attend." West Ham United declined to comment on the matter. The situation highlights the delicate balance clubs must strike between respecting the rights of shareholders and ensuring a safe, enjoyable environment for supporters. As the season unfolds, the FAB’s appeal serves as a reminder that the voices of fans remain a vital component of the club’s governance, especially when contentious figures from the club’s recent past are involved.