The West Ham United Fan Advisory Board (FAB) has publicly asked David Sullivan to refrain from going to the club's home fixtures, warning that his presence could act as a distraction and raise security concerns. In a formal statement the FAB reiterated its apprehension that Sullivan’s attendance at matches held at the London Stadium might cause offence and upset among certain sections of the fan base, and could potentially trigger negative reactions from supporters. Sullivan stepped down from his role as a director and joint chairman of West Ham in June, shortly before The Times and BBC Panorama released an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct. He has consistently denied any wrongdoing.
The supporters' body highlighted that many fans view his presence as unwelcome and that allowing him into the stadium could necessitate additional security resources at a time when both the club and the venue are under financial strain. The FAB noted that the stadium’s operators have already advised the club that Sullivan should not attend matches. The statement also referenced West Ham’s ground regulations, which give the club the authority to refuse entry to any individual whose presence might constitute a danger, nuisance or annoyance to others. While acknowledging that Sullivan remains a major shareholder, the FAB expressed disappointment that the club has not taken proactive steps to bar him from the stands.
It warned that his attendance could reopen old tensions that marked the final period of his tenure at the club. According to the FAB, Sullivan appears to be putting "personal interest before the good of the club," despite receiving high‑level advice to stay away. The supporters' group, however, praised the current executive team, noting that dialogue between the club and its fans has improved and that they have confidence in the direction set by the new leadership. West Ham’s upcoming home campaign kicks off with an EFL Cup tie against Portsmouth on Saturday.
The FAB urged supporters to concentrate on backing the team and fostering a positive atmosphere at the London Stadium, rather than being drawn into controversy surrounding Sullivan’s potential attendance. Sky Sports News has reached out to West Ham United for comment, but the club has not responded. Earlier in the week, reports emerged that the London Stadium operator had recommended to the club that Sullivan refrain from attending games because of the risk of fan unrest. The operator requested advance notice of any planned visits by Sullivan so that extra safety and operational measures could be put in place if needed.
A spokesperson for the London Stadium said: "Following media reports at the end of the season regarding a safeguarding matter being managed by the club, London Stadium sought further information to ensure it could fulfil its own safeguarding responsibilities. Based on the information provided by the club, we understand the matter was investigated and that the club does not consider there to be an ongoing safeguarding risk associated with Mr Sullivan attending the stadium. However, given the potential for demonstrations and anti‑social behaviour by some spectators, we have recommended to the club that he does not attend.
We have also requested advance notice of any planned attendance so that appropriate safety and operational measures can be put in place. For operational reasons we will not comment on if we have had notice that he will attend." The stadium’s caution reflects broader concerns about crowd management and the potential for protests or disruptions that could affect other fans’ enjoyment of the match.
Security experts often advise clubs to limit the presence of high‑profile individuals who are the focus of controversy, especially when investigations or allegations are still fresh in the public mind. In this case, the combination of Sullivan’s former executive role, his ongoing legal battles, and the heightened sensitivity of supporters makes his attendance a delicate issue. From a financial perspective, the club is already navigating cost pressures, and deploying additional security staff or implementing crowd‑control measures for a single individual could strain resources. Moreover, any incident sparked by Sullivan’s presence could attract negative media coverage, potentially affecting sponsorships and the club’s broader reputation.
The FAB’s call also aligns with a growing trend among fan groups to assert influence over club governance and match‑day policies. By publicly voicing concerns, supporters aim to ensure that the club’s leadership prioritises the collective well‑being of the fan community over the personal preferences of any single shareholder, regardless of their financial stake.
In summary, the Fan Advisory Board has asked David Sullivan to stay away from West Ham’s home games, citing potential distraction, security risks, and the possibility of upsetting supporters. While Sullivan remains a major shareholder, the FAB believes his attendance could reignite past tensions and would require unnecessary security expenditures. The club and stadium authorities have both signalled a preference for his non‑attendance, and the supporters’ group encourages fans to focus on supporting the team and maintaining a constructive atmosphere at the London Stadium.