The West Ham United Fan Advisory Board (FAB) has publicly urged David Sullivan to refrain from going to the club's home fixtures, arguing that his presence could act as a distraction and raise security concerns. In a formal statement, the FAB explained that it remains uneasy about the possibility of Sullivan attending matches at the London Stadium because such a move might cause offence or upset among certain sections of the fan base and could provoke hostile reactions. Sullivan stepped down from his role as a director and joint chairman of West Ham in June, shortly before The Times and BBC Panorama released an investigative report into allegations of sexual misconduct.
He has consistently denied any wrongdoing. The supporters' body highlighted that many fans have expressed that his attendance would be unwelcome and that additional security resources would likely be needed at a time when both the club and the stadium are under financial strain. The statement also referenced advice already given to Sullivan by the stadium operators, who have reportedly suggested that he avoid the stands.
West Ham’s ground regulations, the FAB noted, allow the venue to refuse entry to anyone whose presence could constitute a danger, nuisance or annoyance to other spectators. While acknowledging that Sullivan remains a major shareholder, the FAB expressed disappointment that the club has not taken proactive steps to bar him from match days, warning that his appearance could reignite the tensions that marked the final phase of his tenure. According to the FAB, the situation exemplifies what it sees as Sullivan putting personal interest ahead of the club’s welfare, despite receiving high‑level counsel to stay away.
The board, however, reiterated its support for the current executive team, praising the improved dialogue between the club’s management and its supporters and expressing confidence in the direction taken by the new leadership. West Ham’s upcoming home campaign kicks off with an EFL Cup tie against Portsmouth on Saturday. The FAB called on fans to concentrate on backing the team and fostering a positive atmosphere at the London Stadium, rather than becoming embroiled in controversy surrounding the former chairman’s potential attendance. Sky Sports News has approached West Ham United for comment, but the club has not responded.
Earlier in the week, reports emerged that the London Stadium operator had recommended the club advise Sullivan against attending games because of the risk of fan unrest. The operator requested advance notice of any planned visits so that extra safety and operational measures could be put in place. A spokesperson for the London Stadium said: "Following media reports at the end of the season concerning a safeguarding matter being managed by the club, London Stadium sought further information to ensure it could fulfil its own safeguarding responsibilities.
Based on the information provided by the club, we understand the matter was investigated and that the club does not consider there to be an ongoing safeguarding risk associated with Mr Sullivan attending the stadium. However, given the potential for demonstrations and anti‑social behaviour by some spectators, we have recommended to the club that he does not attend. We have also requested advance notice of any planned attendance so that appropriate safety and operational measures can be put in place. For operational reasons we will not comment on if we have had notice that he will attend." The stadium’s caution reflects broader concerns about crowd management and the potential for protests or disruptions when high‑profile, controversial figures are present.
In recent years, football venues across the United Kingdom have faced heightened scrutiny over safety protocols, especially when incidents involving fan behaviour have attracted national attention. The FAB’s request aligns with a growing trend among supporter groups to influence club policy on matters that affect the match‑day experience.
While the FAB acknowledges that Sullivan’s shareholding gives him a legitimate interest in the club’s affairs, it argues that his personal involvement on match days is not essential to the governance of West Ham United. The board suggests that his focus should remain on constructive engagement through shareholder meetings and strategic discussions, rather than physically attending games where his presence could become a flashpoint. In addition to the immediate security considerations, the FAB pointed out the financial implications of deploying extra personnel, CCTV coverage, and crowd‑control barriers should Sullivan decide to attend. With the club already navigating budgetary pressures linked to stadium upkeep and player wages, allocating additional resources to manage a single individual’s attendance could be seen as an inefficient use of limited funds.
Overall, the supporters’ advisory board is urging a pragmatic approach: let the team play without the added distraction of a former chairman whose tenure ended amid controversy. By keeping the focus on football and maintaining a safe, welcoming environment for all fans, West Ham can continue to build on the positive momentum generated by its new leadership and recent on‑field performances.