Rory McIlroy's preparations for his successful Masters title defense have sparked debate, but criticism over the fairness of his time spent at Augusta National has been dismissed. McIlroy became the fourth player to win back-to-back Masters titles after beating Scottie Scheffler by one shot. His comments about regularly playing at Augusta in recent weeks led to a post-tournament debate. However, the golfing community has defended McIlroy, with many arguing that his approach was not an unfair advantage.
Sky Sports Golf's Nick Dougherty said, 'It has no sense to it really. I feel like that's more the people outside of golf not really understanding the process, how it all works and what's available to the players, probably driving it.' McIlroy had chosen not to play in the three PGA Tour events leading up to The Masters, instead opting to practice at Augusta.
He explained, 'I've been on this golf course so much the last three weeks, and that's been a combination of practice and chipping and putting around greens, and then just playing one ball and shooting scores and ending up in weird places that you maybe never find yourself and just trying to figure it out.' The segment on US television sparked a debate, but many have come to McIlroy's defense, including American duo Michael Kim and Kevin Kisner. Kim wrote on social media, 'Yes, there is a number of rounds that ANGC will say no to for me to go by myself and play by myself. That number is prob a little lower for me than a guy like Rory.
If you find a member to host you every time, there's no limit.' Rich Beem also believes that the huge change in course conditions for the tournament limits how much players can learn from practice rounds in the weeks preceding the event. Beem said, 'Whatever Rory saw about the course or did, the course plays so much different two weeks, even a week before the tournament begins, the golf course is changed dramatically.'